Ever heard of INQ? No, until now neither had I. INQ is a phone manufacturer owned by the same group as the phone network Three who have provided me with a review model. As the tech world has shifted it’s focus to smartphones with all manner of touchscreen and QWERTY wizardry, it’s very easy to underestimate a good old-fashioned candybar phone; but looks can be deceiving.

The first thing that hits you about this phone is the design. Though at first it appears to be an unremarkable candybar-style handset, on closer inspection you become captivated by it’s shiny red back (I’m sure there’s a correct name for this red but I’m a man and, as such, only see in 8-bit colour) and sleek metallic rim; the choice of red on black on the phone’s front gives it a feel of subtle sophistication, like a well-made tuxedo. In short, though I usually have a distaste for candybar phones on the same level as I do for people who wear big “neo” style leather jackets and dogs of all species, I absolutely adore the design of this phone. The keypad is a sturdy alpha-numeric one, which took some getting used to having just dismounted my QWERTY high-horse, that gives some organic tactile feedback with each keypress and was a genuine treat after testing the plethora of frustrating on-screen and flatbed keyboards.
It’s 240×320 LCD screen is reasonable but can’t compare to modern AMOLED screens, but this is understandable as this phone is not intended for web-browsing or watching YouTube clips; it’s crystal clear and has a suprisingly good colour depth (though that may simply be the default wallpaper) but is otherwise rather bland. The phone comes with 3G and Bluetooth, the former serving suprisingly quick speeds for a phone that lacks a decent processor, and saves the user from the relentless tediousness of constant side-scrolling by crunching text into a narrower column that can be read in it’s entirety on the screen, suggesting an element of RSS functionality in the browser. The camera is a pretty standard 2 megapixel, delivering a reasonable picture quality but nothing particularly groundbreaking, as the photo below of my flatmates kicking back with some crackers (admitedly just thrown in to annoy them) will show:

The OS is, again, something new for a smartphone, resembling something more akin to the bland Nokia OS circa 2004 than today. It contains a fully customisable scroll-menu along the lower region of the idle-screen to allow quick access to commonly used apps and, by default, includes a number of social apps (ie, facebook and twitter) with the ones you’d expect like address book and messages; a larger menu displays the full range of tools and applications in a tiled-thumbnail manner more Andy Warhol than tomato soup. The phone’s OS seems to lean towards promoting it’s social features, as the phone’s message facility combines SMS, e-mail and Facebook but alerts the user to new Facebook messages just as it would for texts which, given the amount of spam going around on Facebook, can be annoying. The INQ Mini houses all the standard phone features with the luxury of cherry-picking the most vital smartphone features, such as a full HTML browser and an app store, thus it has an MP3 player to complement the USB headphones. Navigating the OS was frustrating, it took me a while to find the larger menu which itself was sometimes confusing and easy to get lost in. Often the phone can show signs of lag which, after prolonged use, becomes tiresome.
As with my previous review of the HTC Hero, this phone came with Skype and Windows Live Messenger apps pre-installed. Overlooking my previous criticism of a Skype app for phones, and saying nothing of the new threat posed to it by the iPhone 4’s FaceTime feature, the app provides free calls to other Skype users and is just as, if not more, clear in call quality as a regular phone call. The UI acts much as a contacts list in your phone and fits well with the simple elegance of the phone, giving only what’s necessary on the front but housing a wealth of options on context menus. The WLM was a useful app to have on-the-go but needs more options for sound, I don’t need my phone to ping at me whenever somebody I haven’t spoken to in years signs in, but has a nice tabular format to display conversations and lists.

The interesting thing about this phone is that, though I’ve made a lot of smartphone comparisons, this phone is not a smartphone, and doesn’t try to be; it’s a refreshing new take on the modern smartphone. Instead of packing all the bells and whistles of the most expensive phones on the market, it strips out all the crap and leaves you with a sturdy and reliable device with just enough features to keep your social life up to date, but without not so many as to drains battery life faster than John Prescott being dipped in gravy. One might call it the poor-man’s smartphone but, though it comes with only the basic features of a smartphone and at a low price, that would do it a disservice and I’m more inclined to call it the efficient man’s smartphone, roping in the modern smartphone to something a little more related to the phone’s original purpose, communication.
Overall, I’d rate this phone at 6.5 out of 10, it’s phenominal design, sturdy keyboard and social features being the bulk of the points and the fact that I’m being careful not to directly compare this to a fully-fledged smartphone remvoing what would otherwise be a huge bias. But the phone is let down by it’s confusing navigation and persistent lag. This phone is not a normal phone, nor is it quite a smartphone, which both means it is feature-poor but also simplistic, if you are looking to dip your toe in the smartphone waters then this is a good place to start and, at an introductory price of £39.99, you really can’t go wrong.



















