Posts Tagged ‘blog’

Fuck Google Analytics

Wednesday, April 7th, 2010

This sign was put up outside the SXSW in Austin, Texas last month, the annual show included a live episode of Diggnation at a local bar Stubbs. Evidentely, they reached capacity and a lot of jumped up little geeks were name/blog-dropping, feeling that this would impact enough on the bouncer to let them in. Louis showed me this last week when we were filming an episode of Tech-Squared, but they just covered it on Diggnation as well so, given it’s apparent coverage, I feel it’s something I have to say for my fellow bloggers.

Now then, I’m a blogger – that’s a fact, but I am also an aspiring writer. The line between blogger and writer is contentious but here’s my take on it: bloggers are people who write about personal things (i.e. an inane commentary on their comings and goings which only show that they have a boring and repetitive life) and people who give opinions on news relating to a certain topic, usually under a domain of their own name, like me. In early posts I mingled tech news with personal shit and, after realising this wasn’t what would interest people in my writing, made a cardinal rule to myself never to write anything personal and keep it closely stuck to the topics I write about. I consider myself a blogger specifically because I fit into the latter of the two types of blogger, but I also consider myself a writer because I do other things, such as writing for my Uni newspaper, technical writing and so on which allow me to practise writing in a serious capacity and will hopefully serve me well for a career as a writer. If I were writing my blog alone, I wouldn’t be, nor would consider myself to be, a writer – I would be a blogger. Being a blogger carries no shame in it, it simply means that one shouldn’t assume some sort of literary prowess from being able to sign up to Wordpress.

I’ve certainly never considered my blog as something meaningful in technology news because, let’s face it – it isn’t. My Google Analytics results are not something to be impressed by. Even if I was gaining a significant number of hits, I would never consider something like that to be in any way impressive – I don’t include this blog on my CV specifically because it’s a cliché, every geek or wannabe writer mentions a blog or gives a URL in the vain hope that this will seem impressive but we all know perfectly well that it doesn’t. My other undertakings in the field of writing allow me to practise writing, blogging also allows me to practise writing – but practise is no substitute for the real thing – until I have something meaningful published, I am simply an aspiring writer.

I like to think that most bloggers don’t consider themselves writers, and certainly don’t believe that they can gain any sort of status from this fact. Some do and that’s, in a word, hilarious – plus it’s stirred me to write a long brewing post on blogging, even better.

Windows Live Writer – A Practical Review

Wednesday, October 21st, 2009

Good Afternoon, again (You’ll understand why again later). I recently read a rave review about a new application on the Windows Live suite, Windows Live Writer, which had installed itself sneakily on my machine when I last updated Live Messenger. It’s not very often that you go to download a new piece of software and find it’s already on your computer, now that’s service!

livewriter

Windows Live Writer is a blog integration tool that links itself to your blog, supporting all the major blogging platforms, including Wordpress (a-thank-you), allowing you to write blog posts with all the creature comforts of Microsoft Word, just as if you were writing a document before posting it online. Features from this include a spell-checker (good for me), standard text formatting tools and previews of how a post will look online before it’s published.

livewriterscreen

I thought the best way to test out the quality of the program is to write an actual blog post, indeed one reviewing the software itself, to my blog and see how it goes. If you look closely at this screenshot, you’ll notice that it’s content is different to this post, that’s because when I was tinkering with the settings (trying to get it to post to two blogs at once) it crashed on me. Lacking an autosave or recovery system, that meant that the post was lost forever. The software does come with options to save drafts as you go both locally and directly to the drafts area on your web server, but neither will save unless you elect to, so keep saving just as you would with any old document, even though Office comes with an autosave function.

As well as the normal old top menu buttons that Microsoft have been gradually phasing out with more recent versions of Office, the word processor facade is re-enforced by the text formatting tools giving everything you’d expect and/or need for a normal blog. It also comes with a few mission-specific buttons for starting/opening/saving new posts. The side menu, which oddly is on the right instead of left, as is normal for most WYSIWYG (What You See Is What You Get) editors, is half a view of recent posts, drafts and links to the blog, and half an insert menu, pre-loaded with all the normal things you would put on a blog post. Clicking “Add a plug-in” takes you to the Microsoft website, specifically a page about available plug-ins and extra functions that are free and, I’d expect, easy to install.

The bottom menu is more interesting, as it has all the admin stuff that I should (but don’t due to laziness) be putting on each post, including categories, tags and publish dates, which are easy to input and are attached to your post just as with a normal post. It also has tabs to see the post you’re working on in various views, edit, preview and source (which churns up your bog-standard HTML coding).

As a piece of kit I’m whelmed (not over or under). It’s a useful little tool, particularly if I can get it to post to both incarnations of my blog and save me having to do constant re-posts, but it’s nothing to write home about. It’s useful for saving me a bit of hassle and may become my main method for writing blog posts, but if I find another version of this application with even slightly better features, I’m jumping ship.

What it really needs is more layout functions. I’m able to do the standard stuff but inserting images with the software, as I have done above, doesn’t come out the same on the edit mode as it does in the preview, and may look different still when published. For example, if I moved an image around a block of text, it’d be interesting to see the text work around the image, like if I wanted a small image central in this paragraph and text all around it, rather than just the entire paragraph shifting around it, above or below.

Here’s an instructional video from Microsoft on using Writer:

My main reason for writing about this software is because of the impact it has on me and my writing. This is the first blog integration tool I’ve ever been persuaded to use and it has a lot of tools that will make my posts easier to deal with in the future. But the proof is in the pudding, so try it out for yourself and comment below.

In other words, I’m too lazy and have too much Uni work to do to properly finish this post off so I’m passing the buck. I plan to write a post in the next few days on Windows 7 when it’s released on Thursday. I’ve downloaded my free copy that I get for being a student from my university, but after the backlash that Microsoft got from early Vista adopters, I’m going to wait a bit and let MS work out the kinks and quickly throw out a few updates before I delve into the land of Windows 7 on my only fully functioning laptop, but I’ll still do an initial thoughts post and later a review.

Time to hit the books, unfortunately one of my text books is 800 pages so it hurts a bit to hit them…………bad joke I know.

Don't Censor Me Bro!

Sunday, August 23rd, 2009

I’ve been hearing things about bloggers in Italy potentially being slapped with new laws (known as the ‘Alfano decree’) that make them as accountable as journalists, so they can be fined or punished if they post anything that could be considered untrue, slanderous or damaging to someone’s reputation without rectifying in what’s known in tabloid terms as the ‘right of reply’. The controversial new laws are simply the next nail in the coffin of oratory liberty amid inordinate amounts of online security under Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi (I’m saying nothing about the tabloids reporting his womanizing having anything to do with this), including the need of a passport to access the internet in cafes or in other public places.

The outcome of this is that Italian bloggers have laid down their keyboards and Italy’s blogosphere has fallen silent. Ok, not totally but that just sounded kinda cool, and there is a definite fear that if these new laws are applied to bloggers then the result won’t be balance on blogs, but silence. On one hand it is perfectly understandable for people, particularly big companies, wanting people who talk about them online to have their facts straight, but I am against these laws for several reasons.

Here’s the reason – they’re unnecessary. Any blog worth reading (like mine) gives opinions with genuine reasoning behind it. If I was to say “Macs are shit” then nobody, regardless of Mac or PC Users, would listen to me or give a hoot what I say unless I back it up. Even if I were to then say “Macs are shit because of this, this and this” people are of course at perfect liberty to comment on the post (as I imagine Louis will) saying “No they’re not because of this, this and this reason”. BUT I shouldn’t be under any obligation to alter the post because it’s an opinion that doesn’t influence anyone specifically. Companies are seriously underestimating the ability of their customers to think for themselves, so if I badmouth Macs, then my readers have the right to take my opinion, do research of their own and form THEIR opinion based on what they gather. Another thing that is underestimated is the sheer number of blogs on the web that are just angry, lonely teenagers ranting about any little thing with no argument or reasoning, and people pay no attention to those people. In a way, bloggers are just more literate versions of people who comment on YouTube videos, and look at the comments of this video. How many of those comments have actual reasoning rather than simply making assertive comments like “macs r the shit yo” – but at the same time how many of the opinions that people give in these comments are you taking seriously or will actually sway you even slightly towards or away from Macs?

In comparison, the video itself is a nicely written video that makes jokes about Mac systems and problems. Which ties in nicely to the dilemma of the piece in that it’s a very one-sided video, and in that case maybe Apple would have the right, were we in Italy, to claim that the video damages it’s reputation.

However, the internet is the most accessible publishing tool in history. If printing and distributing newspapers en mass was as easy in the past, we’d all be doing it, and the internet is, essentially, that. But the sheer scale of opinions, people, blog posts, tweets and identities online mean that censoring it is totally impossible, but it doesn’t need to be censored. Newspapers are in the public consciousness as regulated documents that give out facts, and print retractions when they don’t. Newspapers have behind them the collected opinions of many, collaborated in a persuasive manner that is not specifically designed to, but can have a serious impact in someone’s opinion on an issue. The public perception of blogs is totally different, in that people know that it’s usually just one person writing from their point of view, usually not very persuasively (like my blog) and people are intelligent enough to take the information they’re given with a pinch of salt.

I’ve kinda gone off the point with this a bit, but it all relates back to the issues in Italy. But freedom of speech has been part of democracy for hundreds of years but could only truly be exercised in the past twenty because of the internet, before which there is and was, limits and red-tape preventing (by degrees) in publishing on the amount people could say in books and newspapers. The internet is the first and last line of defense for freedom of speech and if there’s even a hint of similar laws being introduced in the UK, I’ll be the first to blog against it.