Archive for February, 2010

A Matter of Meme

Sunday, February 28th, 2010

The Mobile World Conference has come and gone, passed without much input from me owing to a combination of indifference and an ever-increasing workload that this post seeks simply to exacerbate, but a new development in the Microsoft camps need my scorn…


Picture stolen from CNET UK – they won’t mind, they get more hits than me anyway and I can’t get review models.

I’m not going to go into a review of the device because it is basically a bog-standard phone OS, except app updates appear on the home screen. Instead, I’m going to detail why it will fail…

The reason it will fail is for one reason alone, it’s name. Windows Mobile 7 Series. The only words more depressing than Windows Mobile 7 Series is ‘inflammed clown herpes’, and neither are particularly appealing to go and ask for in bloody Phones4u. The thing that Microsoft consistently, absolutely always, misses is what the modern tech-generation remember anything by – viral. I know that sounds weird but hear me out, television shows for years have stayed in the collective memories of generations, long after they’ve ended, entirely on the catchphrases – “D’oh”,”Could I be anymore…”,”You Plonker”,”No soup for you!” – all made shows stand out and are instantly recognisable.

The same applies to shopping, if you walk into a phone shop and say you want an iPhone – let’s analyse that – it’s snappy, everyone knows what it is mainly because it indicates a single object and appeals to the gimmick Apple have had of grafting the letter i onto every device they’ve ever released.

Now, if you walk into a phone shop and say you want a Windows Mobile 7 Series Phone, not only will you most likely die inside before you finish it, you’ll also get blank looks with a name that sounds so indistinct and tedious. I’m all for branding and it makes sense that they’d continue their Windows OS in this way, but history shows that this just doesn’t work. With a snappier name as much time to ingrain that name into the minds of the public they might have a fighting chance, but they’re far too late – it doesn’t matter how much time they’ve spent perfecting the phone OS because they’ve lost, not only ground but sea and space to Apple.

Microsoft have taken stabs at viral campaigns but these have been pitiful, half-hearted attempts that fail to even become famous for being crap, like their Bill Gates and Seinfeld commercials that somehow managed to make Microsoft seem even more past it. You can just hear Bill sitting in his office thinking “whose funny” and showing how past it he is. The result of this is so squirmy, unfunny and borderline homoerotic it made me want to prise my eyes out with a shoehorn.

You’d be forgiven for thinking that Microsoft has conceded that their market in a lot of things is comprised mostly of businessmen, people who don’t care about how the things look as long as it does the job. This has been a secure region of the market for some time but they’ve tried to show people that they are really young hipsters too, which resulted in the travesty that is Windows Vista, and clamouring to show that they’re down-with-the-peeps (word) with the XBox, before swiftly showing their silver-hair once again by chucking off chipped consoles from XBox Live. But the mobile is different, if they were giving it a dull name simply to grow old gracefully they wouldn’t have included heavy social networking features or anything un-business-like. They leave it, therefore, as a phone aimed at the planet’s population but appealing to the population of Malta. This will fail.

By this point, however, Microsoft’s so old and so long-lasting that the name itself is synonymous with stuffy businessmen and pure tedium – maybe the way Microsoft can make themselves appear younger and edgier is to get rid of Microsoft itself.

Oh, and because I sort of owe CNET because I borrowed that image from them, check out more information on the ejaculations of Microsoft’s Marketing Morons here: The worst Microsoft celebrity videos ever.

Talking out of his iArse

Wednesday, February 24th, 2010

In 2008, Apple deity Steve Jobs damned the Amazon Kindle to the technological abyss by asserting on eBook readers, “It doesn’t matter how good or bad the product is, the fact is that people don’t read anymore. Forty percent of the people in the U.S. read one book or less last year.” Fast-foward to 2010 and chuckle with glee from your comfy desk chair as you watch his holiness make a u-turn with all the elegance of an agitated baboon as the iPad comes out, brimming with eBook reader features and plans to release books on the app store. But maybe Jobs wasn’t talking out of his iArse back then, as Google takes up hammers to nail down the coffin of the printed word, people are still reading – but Google want their own say on how they do so.

Google have been, for lack of a better word, prolific in their endeavours – rising from an obscure, oddly named search engine to a main player in almost every digital pie they can stick their grubby little fingers into. Having perfected and, with increasing speed, enacted the art of data collection, and having catalogued nearly every scrap of data, they’re moving on to the most old school of old school information distribution and are attempting to digitise books…

For around six years now, Google have been feaverishly cataloging books faster than a hyperactive librarian, meticulously scanning page after page and applying character recognition to create a vast database of books and their content, with a view to have search terms passed through the data and return books that contain information on your search term. The amount of content that you’ll get to see from results is, as of yet, undetermined, as Google are, as you’d expect, being put through the motions of copyright issues. The overarching concept is that, rather than searching to find websites with the information you need, or having to face the daring feat of going to your local library for books on the subject, you can get information the credibility of a book without the hassle and trauma of standing upright.

We’re missing the bigger picture here – Google have tirelessly worked to build what is essentially a global centre for websites, videos, shopping and anything that the internet can do. But there’s always been a divide (a ‘digital divide’ if you will) between information readily available digitally and what’s hard to obtain, but often more useful, in hard copy – once again, also, it’s a trade off between convenience and precision.

It’s not unlike Wikipedia, show me a single regular internet user who hasn’t used the editable encyclopedia in some capacity, it is used because it is a prolific and centralised hub of information. The problem with Wikipedia, as with any website, is that there is a big difference in how this information is moderated – although, despite the bad press it gets, Wikipedia is arguably a more reliable source than other sites as a whole, because it is moderated to a degree whereas the web is not – which means there is no guarantee that the information you see is correct. Getting a book published is another aquatic vertebrate teapot, however, as a manuscript, reseach and information is subject to detailed editing, proof reading and review before a publisher sinks it’s cash into bringing it to paper and print. Non-fiction, therefore, and in particular publications of a scientific or otherwise factual matter is heavily moderated and it’s content is, again arguably, of greater veracity. Google is using their technology to make an online encyclopedia of entirely moderated information, with a plethora of fiction to boot.

I’m usually the first, or at least the second, to bemoan how a new project or gadget won’t be a success for this reason or that reason – but for once the sneeringly cynical side of my brain is taking a holiday, because I think this is fantastic. Many have accepted the sad but ultimately inevitable fact that libraries and books aren’t the primary method of getting information anymore, as with everything the convenience of our ability to retreive massive volumes of information with little more than a few finger movements has lead to it’s downturn. However, if we can get the same availability from sources as reputable and scrutinised as books, plus Google’s ubiquity as an information source, the oft-quoted dystopian vision of a world built on unmoderated and inaccurate information can be shut down by the luddite morons that preach it.

If Jobs is to be believed, the printed word might be dead, but it lives on in another form, albeit an abstract and entirely non-physical form, almost like a spirit…it’s oddly poetic. Gah, that was sickeningly sentimental.

Oh yeah, and if anyone smugly declares anything about the printed word technically living on as eInk screens on eBook Readers they will receive a swift and precise beating with my Sherlock Holmes collection – which is a heavy motherfucker.

Eye on Earth

Friday, February 19th, 2010

Evening all, I’m still alive……..oi, I heard that. My attempts to write the recent tech news have been early successes that soon succumb to the worry about looming coursework deadlines and have stopped my creative  juices flowing – which shows you just how exciting my coursework is that I needn’t be creative. Luckily, my writing for Spark*, something I take as seriously as coursework (otherwise I’d never write), means that I am forced to spout some form of tech-news related writing every fortnight, which will keep me on my stylistic toes until I’m free enough to start regular posts again. Here’s my latest article that I’ve submitted to Spark*, Roya (mentioned and quoted in the article) is my flatmate and I should also mentioned that I’ve been asked to take the position of deputy editor of the science/tech section of Spark after the summer.

Eye on Earth

EyeonEarthReadingUni

They say that when something is out of sight, it’s often out of mind; that could certainly be said of climate change. Our narrow perception of our surroundings out of wider context makes it hard to see how much we contribute to global warming. Now, a joint venture between the European Environment Agency (EEA) and Microsoft seeks to show everyday web users exactly what’s happening to their planet, which they’ve dubbed Eye on Earth.
Eye on Earth may sound like the title of an Orwellian nightmare, but, in fact, it’s a website showing an interactive map of the 32 EEA member-countries, upon which users can enter information on the air and water quality using set descriptions such as ‘good’, ‘irritating’ and ‘clean’, alongside official data, all for the site’s visitors to see. The hope is that users will investigate and contribute to the map, allowing them to see precisely how their area compares with other towns, cities or even countries and appreciate how their own carbon footprint can have a visible impact when put into the wider context. The venture is in its infancy at the moment, but those behind it intend to expand the data displayed on the map to include other key indicators of environmental health, as well as provide tips on going green.
Eye on Earth is, itself, eco-friendly, the entire site utilises ‘cloud computing’, outsourcing the storage and processing power required to the servers of ‘cloud’ companies, which would be running at the same energy-output with or without the inclusion of this site. Taking in user-data in this manner is known on the web as crowd-sourcing, where an organisation uses their audience to gather and process information in a fraction of the time it would take to do it themselves. An example of crowd-sourcing includes the MP expenses scandal – when Westminster released 500,000 claim forms, instead of wading through the documents, The Guardian enlisted readers to review unchecked documents online for something news-worthy (i.e. poultry real-estate) and flag it for the journalists to review and print. Eye on Earth, then, is so green it recycles people.
With crowd-sourcing and the publicity that involving Microsoft will bring, those in support of the project feel that this is the ultimate twenty-first century way of raising awareness, including campaigners around the Reading University campus. Green Week representative, Roya Shahrokni, said, “I think it’s brilliant. Seeing something like this will help to raise awareness of the damage that’s being done to our environment and, hopefully, encourage people to start pulling their weight in the fight against climate change.”
The scheme has drawn its fair share of criticism, however, as some feel that this method of data collection is unreliable, relying on the perception different people without clear qualification to discern air or water quality. Though few are criticising how this scheme will raise the public consciousness, there is vocal opposition to this scheme as a source of information, fearing that the presence of official figures will be overlooked due to the higher volume of potentially inaccurate user data.
Eye on Earth is available online at: http://eyeonearth.cloudapp.net/

No time to procrastinate

Wednesday, February 10th, 2010

Hey all, if you’ve noticed that my blog posts have been a subtly mixed combination of sparse and slap-dash recentely then you’re an obsessive twat.

Nevertheless, this is so, and I feel I owe anybody (if they exist) who noticed the above statement an explanation.

Through a combination of sorting out finances and other such gubbins surrounding finding and renting my first house for my second year of Uni, coursework coming out the wazoo that, from, stretches to the very last day of the term, revision over the easter break and exams upon return, this is to be expected.

I’ve not been blog-idle, however, as I’ve been cobbling together posts in my spare moments and will be posting them as soon as they’re finished. Plus, come summer I’ll have more time to write posts, as I did during my blog-writing infancy.

Night all.

Request from a Recovering Farmvillian

Saturday, February 6th, 2010

Hey all, apparentely I’m taking requests now – but at least I know one person is actually reading this damn thing.

My friend Fraser, discontent with the projectile lobbying of digital livestock, tasked me on Facebook with this:

…any ideas for email applications that aren’t web based (need to be signed into msn messenger for email notifications, and i cant integrate it with my uni account), or mozilla thunderbird (theres like a 5 min delay between the email reaching my actual inbox and it appearing in thunderbird, which doesn’t seem m…uch, but it annoys me)? and apparently the newer windows mail / outlook dont let you use your hotmail account? fussssyyyyy.

This question threw a metaphorical spanner into my metaphorical brainstuffs as my usual answer to this is simply “Mozilla Thunderbird, fool!”. Alas, though I chastise Fraser for being put off by a five-minute delay when only the obsessed, and bored students, check their e-mail with any frequency upwards of five minutes, but seeing as Fraser is both – I must press on.

Personally, I have taken to forgoing web-based e-mail altogether and get anything related to Uni, Blogging or my other wheelings-and-dealings to my Palm Pre and have a browser-based e-mail for all the other crap (i.e. horoscopes, facebook/youtube/twitter notifications, etc.). Thus, my initial recommendation is that, if you have one, sync your important stuff with your phone and never check with your browser, thus you never notice any delay. Again, this solution may only work for some so press we on again…

As much as I hate to push Microsoft software over open-source Mozilla software, no other company really does e-mail clients better than Outlook, and I feel it would be unfair of me to write it off with Vista, Silverlight and that weird music-generation software they’ve been dabbling in without a proper look. Outlook is the oldest and most refined software, ideal for syncing with POP and IMAP e-mail services. Outlook has been regenerated recentely into “Windows Live Mail”, no doubt to keep up branding with Live Messenger (formerly MSN) and the rest of the Live suite that get’s pushed on you when you try to install Messenger.

I had no trouble syncing my live.co.uk e-mail account with Live Mail but, as Fraser rightly puts, Hotmail seems to be Microsoft’s unwanted, and poorly named, child that they are leaving out in the cold like so much mouldy cheese (I really should’ve put it in the fridge). In public, Microsoft won’t hold Hotmail’s hand as they cross the road, but on paper they’ll accept that they slept with that golddigging slut and will let Hotmail in with a blanket over it’s head. Tutorials online show you how to complete this setup and, were I in a position to test it, I would do so. However, sworn testimony from people on the internet, so you know it’s trustworthy, says that this simple method works; good luck Fraser, let me know how it goes….

http://www.freeemailtutorials.com/windowsLiveMail/setupEmailAccounts/setupHotmailAccount.htm

Apologies for the long break in posts, swamped with Uni work. However, a big sycophantic post about how great it is to live in the 21st century with technology is right around the corner, when I start planning it.